Usable environmental knowledge from the perspective of decision-making: the logics of consequentiality, appropriateness, and meaningfulness

Printer-friendly versionPDF version
Nov 15, 2019
Author: 
Art Dewulf, Nicole Klenk, Carina Wyborn, Maria Carmen Lemos

 

Abstract

Environmental knowledge is a crucial input for public and private decision-making, yet often useful environmental knowledge appears to be unusable for decision-makers. To better understand how usable knowledge can be produced, we need to build on a better understanding of decision-making processes. We distinguish three different logics of decision-making and discuss their implications for knowledge use: (1) the logic of consequentiality, rooted in theories of rational choice, in which environmental knowledge is used because of its utilitarian value; (2) the logic of appropriateness, rooted in institutional theories, in which environmental knowledge is used because it fits existing rules and routines; and (3) the logic of meaningfulness, rooted in theories of sensemaking and interpretation, in which environmental knowledge is used because it makes sense to decision-makers. The theory and practice of environmental knowledge (co-)production can profit from considering these different logics of decision-making.

 

Read the full article in Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.



DOI for citing: 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.003
Share: Facebook Icon Twitter Icon Linked Icon